The Minkoff Minx {Go Ahead…Make Your Move!}

"I get very passionate about what I think is right."-Hillary Rodham Clinton

And a new day has begun

Well just some of the stuff I found in my reader this morning…

Kudos to Brad Reed over and C&L, I had to copy and past the whole post cause it was all just to dang good to pick and choose from:

Oh look, it’s yet another Washington Post editorial coming to the defense of poor Roman Polanski. This time it’s written by Richard Cohen and it’s called:

Thank you, Switzerland, for freeing Polanski

And see, right off the bat things get weird. Thanking a foreign country for freeing a child rapist is a little strange. It’s akin to saying, “Thank you, North Korea, for crushing those dissidents” or “Thank you, China, for undermining our export sector.” In other words, you don’t normally pat countries on the head for doing things like this. Anyway, let’s see where he’s headed with this:

The Swiss got it right. Their refusal to extradite film director Roman Polanski to the United States on a 33-year-old sex charge is the proper dénouement for this mess of a case. There is no doubt that Polanski did what he did, which is have sex with a 13-year-old after plying her with booze. There is no doubt also that after all these years there is something stale about the case, not to mention a “victim,” Samantha Geimer, who has long ago forgiven her assailant and dearly wishes the whole thing would go away. So do I.

The scare quotes around the word “victim” are truly a sight to behold. Under Cohen’s calculus, we should just free people who commit crimes if they’ve managed to escape the law for long enough. After all, getting an underage girl drunk and then raping her can totally be forgiven if it happened a long time ago.

There are only bad reasons to proceed with the prosecution.

Really? I can think of a good one right off the bat: He drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl. That’s a pretty good reason in and of itself, even if “Chinatown” was a pretty sweet movie.

The first is to rebut the argument that some sort of legal or moral exception ought to be made for Polanski on account of his talent. Having just seen his film “The Pianist” for the second time, I salute his genius as, if I knew something about poetry, I might that of Ezra Pound.

Wait, I don’t get the logic here. Per Cohen, one of the bad reasons to prosecute Polanski is because it will refute the morons who think we shouldn’t prosecute people who make good movies? Does that make a lick of sense to you? And look, the movies aren’t relevant to anything. He should go to jail because he drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl.

The only argument in favor of Polanski’s continued freedom is that he is the victim of judicial misconduct. He had good reason to believe that the trial judge in his case was going to break the plea agreement and throw the book at him. He had already pleaded guilty to a reduced charge; he had already spent 42 days in Chino State Prison under psychiatric examination. […] He ran from the prospect of a judge who was going to make his reputation at Polanski’s expense and send him to jail for a very long time. I would have done the same.

Well that’s good to know, Rich! We’ll keep that in mind if you ever get arrested for drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl!

But seriously, can anyone make sense of Cohen’s moral reasoning here? His argument is that if you drug and rape a 13-year-old girl and you suspect that a mean and nasty judge might have it in for you then you have the right to… flee the country?!

Look, dude, we have an appeals process in this country for people who feel that they’ve been wrongfully imprisoned. And Roman wouldn’t have been wrongfully imprisoned since he, you know, drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl.

(I know I keep mentioning this pesky little fact over and over again, but it’s a pretty horrible crime that Polanski’s defenders don’t like to bring up. They should be reminded on a regular basis the sort of thing they’re defending.)

OK, so where was I? Oh yeah: Even if poor, poor Roman Polanski had received a super-mean sentence from that nasty little judge, he could have easily appealed it. And given the fact that he’s rich and can afford good legal help, his appeal probably would have been successful. Having a judge who doesn’t like you doesn’t give you a carte blanche to run off to France to escape justice, no matter how many times “The Pianist” made Richard Cohen cry.

It was this alleged — but virtually proven — miscarriage of justice that impressed the Swiss authorities and why they rejected the American requests for extradition. That was good. It would have been better, though, if at the same time they denounced the many artists and intellectuals who haughtily dismissed what Polanski had done on the basis of his talent and achievements. They thought of his films; they should have thought of their own daughters.

Wait, so now he’s back to trashing people who defend Polanski on the basis of his artistic talents. Did Cohen write this column while sampling whatever vile concoction Polanski uses to ply his victims (or “victims,” in Cohen’s version)? I have no idea. I do know that it looks like Cohen vomited alphabet soup onto his computer screen and decided to file it as an opinion piece.

But on the other hand, “Rosemary’s Baby” was a pretty sweet movie.

The thing that gets me is some of the comments on this post. The point that Reed makes over and over is Polanski “drugged and raped a 13 year-old-girl.”  They are blasting Reed…but I guess it is because as one comment says…there are a lot of Pro-Polanski readers on C&L. Which if it is true, is very sad indeed.

Then there was this bit at Hot Air: Congressman: WH directive to NASA confirmed

A month ago, Bolden informed Olson of his new mission, and Olson accused the Obama administration of lying about it to escape criticism…

…This administration doesn’t want to spend money in space, but they do want to spend it on efforts best left to the State Department.  Except now, of course, we can also factor into the equation a healthy dose of dishonesty.  Instead of admitting that Obama had made a mistake, they dumped the entire blame on Bolden, who wouldn’t be appearing on Al-Jazeera in the first place without getting approval up the chain of command first.

And this Commentary on No Quarter:

Those Obamabots stopped at nothing to go after Obama’s critics personally. And their attacks were non-stop, 24/7, and written all over the Internet. There was no such thing as a rational discussion about Obama’s actual qualifications and viewpoints. No. In fact, the Obamabots went after ALL of us who dared to oppose Obama. They very nearly ruined the lives of many who criticized Obama.

I have to add this from yesterday…Whoopie Goldberg defends Mel Gibson.  I just do not understand how anyone can defend Mel Gibson. But as Woman Voter, one of the commentators on that post over at Tennessee Guerrilla Woman states…Whoopie defended Polanski too. Which brings me back up to the first link I posted up top. What the hell is wrong with people to rationalize the abuse of women and young girls? How can these people get away with it? It just really pisses me off!

Advertisements

Filed under: Absorbing Cock and Bull, , , , , ,

MinkoffMinx on Twitter

“I’m a Sky Dancer!”

I am so proud to be a member of the Front Page Team.

SkyDancingBlog.com

Sky Dancing Blog

I am very proud to be a part of this diverse group of writers. We have articles on a variety of topics. It is not just politics...we discuss psychology, health care, environmental issues, farming, economics, current events, art, literature and just about anything that sparks an interesting discussion.

~ a place to discuss real issues ~

Stop by and become part of the conversation.

www.SkyDancingBlog.com

RSS My post over at Sky Dancing:

  • Wednesday Reads: Passing the Death Bill …Hump Day Cartoons 
    The assholes are determined to pass the death bill. Meanwhile, Dak is hunkered down amongst torrential rainstorms and tornadoes.  So this will be a quick post: 06/21 Mike Luckovich: Ken gets real. This is an open thread. 
  • Sunday Reads: ffather’s Day. Just a straight “fuh”…
    👆🏼  See that image? I still haven’t spoken those two words together… and very proud of that fact. It is Father’s Day…so let me first start out by wishing all the daddies the best on this special Sunday. I was planning on writing a happy post, with happy links. Then I started to review the […]
  • Wednesday Reads: Butkus or Buttkiss? Hump Day Cartoons 
    Something tells me, that you will get a sense of where the title of this post is coming from… …by the sample of these first few images and cartoons.  Oh…shit. I’m getting ahead of myself.  Let me post a few links, and then get to the cartoons.  The arse-licking was epic https://t.co/B46hfZRzjf https://t.co/1twoeuEpPW — Pat […]
  • Sunday Reads: Wonderful Women 
    Good Afternoon This is going to be quick, that is what happens when a migraine is on day two…and the medicine ain’t working.  This is an open thread. 
  • Wednesday Reads: tRumpaholics … Hump Day Cartoons 
    One of the first things we were taught in my survey of politics course when I was Junior in college, was the importance of pens in Washington D.C.  LBJ made them a big deal, when signing legislation…he would sign his name…each letter with a different pen, and then give this special pens out to those […]
  • Sunday Reads: London….This is London 
    The above tweet found this morning…. I’m not in the mindset to come up with the words today. In fact, I doubt that my brain can wrap itself around any type of news that poured out of London late last night. When I heard the sirens on the television, my parents were watching live coverage, […]