The Minkoff Minx {Go Ahead…Make Your Move!}

"I get very passionate about what I think is right."-Hillary Rodham Clinton

And a new day has begun

Well just some of the stuff I found in my reader this morning…

Kudos to Brad Reed over and C&L, I had to copy and past the whole post cause it was all just to dang good to pick and choose from:

Oh look, it’s yet another Washington Post editorial coming to the defense of poor Roman Polanski. This time it’s written by Richard Cohen and it’s called:

Thank you, Switzerland, for freeing Polanski

And see, right off the bat things get weird. Thanking a foreign country for freeing a child rapist is a little strange. It’s akin to saying, “Thank you, North Korea, for crushing those dissidents” or “Thank you, China, for undermining our export sector.” In other words, you don’t normally pat countries on the head for doing things like this. Anyway, let’s see where he’s headed with this:

The Swiss got it right. Their refusal to extradite film director Roman Polanski to the United States on a 33-year-old sex charge is the proper dénouement for this mess of a case. There is no doubt that Polanski did what he did, which is have sex with a 13-year-old after plying her with booze. There is no doubt also that after all these years there is something stale about the case, not to mention a “victim,” Samantha Geimer, who has long ago forgiven her assailant and dearly wishes the whole thing would go away. So do I.

The scare quotes around the word “victim” are truly a sight to behold. Under Cohen’s calculus, we should just free people who commit crimes if they’ve managed to escape the law for long enough. After all, getting an underage girl drunk and then raping her can totally be forgiven if it happened a long time ago.

There are only bad reasons to proceed with the prosecution.

Really? I can think of a good one right off the bat: He drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl. That’s a pretty good reason in and of itself, even if “Chinatown” was a pretty sweet movie.

The first is to rebut the argument that some sort of legal or moral exception ought to be made for Polanski on account of his talent. Having just seen his film “The Pianist” for the second time, I salute his genius as, if I knew something about poetry, I might that of Ezra Pound.

Wait, I don’t get the logic here. Per Cohen, one of the bad reasons to prosecute Polanski is because it will refute the morons who think we shouldn’t prosecute people who make good movies? Does that make a lick of sense to you? And look, the movies aren’t relevant to anything. He should go to jail because he drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl.

The only argument in favor of Polanski’s continued freedom is that he is the victim of judicial misconduct. He had good reason to believe that the trial judge in his case was going to break the plea agreement and throw the book at him. He had already pleaded guilty to a reduced charge; he had already spent 42 days in Chino State Prison under psychiatric examination. […] He ran from the prospect of a judge who was going to make his reputation at Polanski’s expense and send him to jail for a very long time. I would have done the same.

Well that’s good to know, Rich! We’ll keep that in mind if you ever get arrested for drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl!

But seriously, can anyone make sense of Cohen’s moral reasoning here? His argument is that if you drug and rape a 13-year-old girl and you suspect that a mean and nasty judge might have it in for you then you have the right to… flee the country?!

Look, dude, we have an appeals process in this country for people who feel that they’ve been wrongfully imprisoned. And Roman wouldn’t have been wrongfully imprisoned since he, you know, drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl.

(I know I keep mentioning this pesky little fact over and over again, but it’s a pretty horrible crime that Polanski’s defenders don’t like to bring up. They should be reminded on a regular basis the sort of thing they’re defending.)

OK, so where was I? Oh yeah: Even if poor, poor Roman Polanski had received a super-mean sentence from that nasty little judge, he could have easily appealed it. And given the fact that he’s rich and can afford good legal help, his appeal probably would have been successful. Having a judge who doesn’t like you doesn’t give you a carte blanche to run off to France to escape justice, no matter how many times “The Pianist” made Richard Cohen cry.

It was this alleged — but virtually proven — miscarriage of justice that impressed the Swiss authorities and why they rejected the American requests for extradition. That was good. It would have been better, though, if at the same time they denounced the many artists and intellectuals who haughtily dismissed what Polanski had done on the basis of his talent and achievements. They thought of his films; they should have thought of their own daughters.

Wait, so now he’s back to trashing people who defend Polanski on the basis of his artistic talents. Did Cohen write this column while sampling whatever vile concoction Polanski uses to ply his victims (or “victims,” in Cohen’s version)? I have no idea. I do know that it looks like Cohen vomited alphabet soup onto his computer screen and decided to file it as an opinion piece.

But on the other hand, “Rosemary’s Baby” was a pretty sweet movie.

The thing that gets me is some of the comments on this post. The point that Reed makes over and over is Polanski “drugged and raped a 13 year-old-girl.”  They are blasting Reed…but I guess it is because as one comment says…there are a lot of Pro-Polanski readers on C&L. Which if it is true, is very sad indeed.

Then there was this bit at Hot Air: Congressman: WH directive to NASA confirmed

A month ago, Bolden informed Olson of his new mission, and Olson accused the Obama administration of lying about it to escape criticism…

…This administration doesn’t want to spend money in space, but they do want to spend it on efforts best left to the State Department.  Except now, of course, we can also factor into the equation a healthy dose of dishonesty.  Instead of admitting that Obama had made a mistake, they dumped the entire blame on Bolden, who wouldn’t be appearing on Al-Jazeera in the first place without getting approval up the chain of command first.

And this Commentary on No Quarter:

Those Obamabots stopped at nothing to go after Obama’s critics personally. And their attacks were non-stop, 24/7, and written all over the Internet. There was no such thing as a rational discussion about Obama’s actual qualifications and viewpoints. No. In fact, the Obamabots went after ALL of us who dared to oppose Obama. They very nearly ruined the lives of many who criticized Obama.

I have to add this from yesterday…Whoopie Goldberg defends Mel Gibson.  I just do not understand how anyone can defend Mel Gibson. But as Woman Voter, one of the commentators on that post over at Tennessee Guerrilla Woman states…Whoopie defended Polanski too. Which brings me back up to the first link I posted up top. What the hell is wrong with people to rationalize the abuse of women and young girls? How can these people get away with it? It just really pisses me off!

Advertisements

Filed under: Absorbing Cock and Bull, , , , , ,

MinkoffMinx on Twitter

“I’m a Sky Dancer!”

I am so proud to be a member of the Front Page Team.

SkyDancingBlog.com

Sky Dancing Blog

I am very proud to be a part of this diverse group of writers. We have articles on a variety of topics. It is not just politics...we discuss psychology, health care, environmental issues, farming, economics, current events, art, literature and just about anything that sparks an interesting discussion.

~ a place to discuss real issues ~

Stop by and become part of the conversation.

www.SkyDancingBlog.com

RSS My post over at Sky Dancing:

  • Wednesday Reads: Bloody Discounts
    For your consideration today: New charges filed in Manafort-Gates case https://t.co/ET7RRjLhTs via @joshgersteinpic.twitter.com/P5DtvUJpdB — POLITICO (@politico) February 21, 2018 On the gun control fight…. Who is Dana Loesch? The NRA’s defender after the Florida shooting | US news | The Guardian   But as students who survived the mass shooting at Marjory St […]
  • Sunday Reads: The “Twits” are strong with this “Orange” dickhead.
      The image above is from the Instagram of one of the survivors from the Valentine’s Day murders at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. It is just one of the victim reactions to the killings…another has been the vocal call outs and public outcries from many MSDHS students. They are not taking the “thoughts and […]
  • Wednesday Reads: Such a nice guy…
    Happy Valentine’s Day! When you got friends…who needs lawyers? Wait, or is that vice versa… Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Says He Paid Stormy Daniels Out of His Own Pocket – The New York Times Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s longtime personal lawyer, said on Tuesday that he paid $130,000 out of his own pocket to a […]
  • Sunday Reads: You say New Or-LEENS…I say New New AW-yunz
    Let’s call the whole thing off! New Orleans, you’re still like family — flawed, yes, but oh so fun, even after 300 years y mother called our city New AW-yunz. I say New OR-lens, although New AW-lens or New Or-lee-uns sometimes slides out of my mouth. A local professor told me New Or-LEENS is the favored […]
  • Wednesday Reads: Springtime for tRump…
    There will be GOOSESTEPPING in the streets come springtime…yup. You can count on it…with just about as much certainty as you have that tRump is turning America into his own little authoritarian regime. By now you all have heard of this shit: Trump’s ‘marching orders’ to the Pentagon: Plan a grand military parade – The Washington […]
  • Sunday Reads: “Kook” and Kremlin Spook
      Yesterday evening Time Magazine broke a news story about Carter Page. Carter Page Touted Russia Contacts in 2013 Letter | Time Apparently Page had written a book on his “academic” views of Russia, and in trying to get the book published…actually bragged about being a spy. However, in the last paragraph of the article, the […]